I have to go make books. Sorry about that.
I asked a French critic a couple of years ago why my books did so well in France. He said it was because in my novels people both act and think. I got a kick out of that.
I enjoy about 1 out of 100 movies, it's about the same proportion to books published that I care to read.
There's more fiction in my life than in books, so I don't bother with them.
Young men should prove theorems, old men should write books.
Books give not wisdom where none was before. But where some is, there reading makes it more.
You are welcome to your intellectual pastimes and books and art and newspapers; welcome, too, to your bars and your whisky that only makes me ill. Here am I in the forest, quite content.
I try not to worry about rewriting books that worked well the first time. I'm too busy writing new books to worry about things that are already in print.
Two things I do well in books are sex and violence, but I don't want gratuitous sex or violence. The sex and violence are only as graphic as need be. And never included unless it furthers the plot or character development.
I took up a sort of a hobby of just hanging around the local library. I'd pick out an author and I would read all their books.
I look at my books the way parents look at their children. The fact that one becomes more successful than the others doesn't make me love the less successful one any less.
Writing for children is bloody difficult; books for children are as complex as their adult counterparts, and they should therefore be accorded the same respect.
I've written 16 children's books and five unpublished novels. Some of the latter were breathtakingly bad.
Jane Austen was writing about boring people with desperately limited lives. We forget this because we've seen too many of her books on screen.
Reading is a conversation. All books talk. But a good book listens as well.