Most of my books have been written in the form of fantasy.
If writers learn more from their books than do readers, perhaps I may have begun to learn.
Books that have become classics - books that have had their day and now get more praise than perusal - always remind me of retired colonels and majors and captains who, having reached the age limit, find themselves retired on half pay.
Good books, like good friends, are few and chosen; the more select, the more enjoyable.
Observation more than books and experience more than persons, are the prime educators.
Study nature, not books.
In the case of good books, the point is not to see how many of them you can get through, but how many can get through to you.
Books are the legacies that a great genius leaves to mankind, which are delivered down from generation to generation as presents to the posterity of those who are yet unborn.
Well I guess the plan was to write poetry and publish books and make a living from writing poetry. That was a pretty ambitious plan I guess.
I understand that when people read my books that there's something there - but I don't identify with it.
With Shakespeare and poetry, a new world was born. New dreams, new desires, a self consciousness was born. I desired to know to know myself in terms of the new standards set by these books.
I write sets of books, but I've also written a lot of orphans.
I'm one of those writers who, when writing, believes she's god-and that she hasn't bestowed free will on any of her characters. In that sense there are no surprises in any of my books.
When I'm not writing or tweaking my computer, I do embroidery. When I'm not plunging into the past, tweaking, or embroidering, I'm reading books about history, computers, or embroidery.