In the nineteenth century, slavery was the greatest wrong, and government never stood so tall as when it was redressing that wrong.
Before my tenure, people didn't seem to think that citizens had a right to limit the size of their government.
I extend that to the abortion issue, I extend that to the so-called gay rights issue, I think this is a freedom principle and consistent with the analysis in the economic area as well.
I think transportation and corrections are not the first two areas that I would go looking for massive change.
I think government has a major role to play in helping us with the pursuit of happiness.
I think coercive taxation is theft, and government has a moral duty to keep it to a minimum.
I suggest to you that increasing the size of America's economic pie - which can be achieved only if everybody has a seat at the table - is the most important challenge facing our country today.
I have come to realize that Jesse Helms stands for everything in politics that is anathema to me.
If we have major geographic areas within our continent that have a tremendous lack of economic opportunity, we found that that is going to produce instability _ economic, political and social.
I don't understand the Democrats' approach to Social Security in this country, and I'm not alone.
I dare say that a majority of the American people think that having a fair hearing on an issue of importance in our relations with Mexico is extremely important to our national interest, as well as theirs.
Government is never so noble as when it is addressing wrongs.
Government has a role as well in what is referred to as redistributive justice.
Do we believe that there is equal economic opportunity out there in the real world, right now, for each and every one of these groups? If we believed in the tooth fairy, if we believed in the Easter Bunny, we might well believe that.
It's healthy for government to be a kind of moral catalyst, using the bully pulpit of high office.