When it comes to federal elections law, Tom DeLay and his special-interest friends live by one set of rules, and everyone else lives by a very different set.
It's not wise to violate rules until you know how to observe them.
The citizen is becoming a pawn in a game where nobody knows the rules, where everybody consequently doubts that there are rules at all, and where the vocabulary has been diminished to such an extent that nobody is even sure what the game is all about.
You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else.
When you talk about changing the rules, that takes time, and it always involves more than just a committee.
Perhaps one of the only positive pieces of advice that I was ever given was that supplied by an old courtier who observed: Only two rules really count. Never miss an opportunity to relieve yourself; never miss a chance to sit down and rest your feet.
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
The school-boy doesn't force himself to learn his vocabularies and rules altogether at night, but knows that be must impress them again in the morning.
I define nothing. Not beauty, not patriotism. I take each thing as it is, without prior rules about what it should be.
Live one day at a time emphasizing ethics rather than rules.
I believe in rules. Sure I do. If there weren't any rules, how could you break them?
I made a game effort to argue but two things were against me: the umpires and the rules.
I mean, I was always interested in people like Lenny Bruce, people who are breaking the old rules and making new ones.
Mormons... are so strong, they can handle wealth, they are confident. I think it is because they are not bogged down by rules for equality, but have a firmly defined system of relative status and responsible command.
I am not someone who believes we should build a fence around our country but I do believe there ought to be some fairness with respect to the rules of this globalization.