It was at this moment that I wrote my first important paper in theoretical physics. I was 32 years old, 5 years beyond the alleged age of senility for theorists.
We live, I think, in the century of science and, perhaps, even in the century of physics.
Originally I had planned to revert to nuclear physics there, in particular the structure of the deuteron.
Cambridge was the place for someone from the Colonies or the Dominions to go on to, and it was to the Cavendish Laboratory that one went to do physics.
In science there is only physics; all the rest is stamp collecting.
The grounding in natural sciences which I obtained in the course of my medical studies, including preliminary examinations in botany, zoology, physics, and chemistry, was to become decisive in determining the trend of my literary work.
If you miss one day in physics, that's it.
Nothing can be more incorrect than the assumption one sometimes meets with, that physics has one method, chemistry another, and biology a third.
Physics is becoming too difficult for the physicists.
Teaching physics at the University, and more general lecturing to wider audiences has been a major concern.
From a consideration of the immense volume of newly discovered facts in the field of physics, especially atomic physics, in recent years it might well appear to the layman that the main problems were already solved and that only more detailed work was necessary.
Yes, I was really good in physics and in math.
The violent reaction on the recent development of modern physics can only be understood when one realises that here the foundations of physics have started moving; and that this motion has caused the feeling that the ground would be cut from science.
When modern physics exerts itself to establish the world's formula, what occurs thereby is this: the being of entities has resolved itself into the method of the totally calculable.
It's always a combination of physics and poetry that I find inspiring. It's hard to wrap your head around things like the Hubble scope.