Both French and Latin are involved with nationalistic and religious implications which could not be entirely shaken off, and so, while they seemed for a long time to have solved the international language problem up to a certain point, they did not really do so in spirit.
As a matter of fact, a national language which spreads beyond its own confines very quickly loses much of its original richness of content and is in no better case than a constructed language.
A standard international language should not only be simple, regular, and logical, but also rich and creative.
A common creation demands a common sacrifice, and perhaps not the least potent argument in favour of a constructed international language is the fact that it is equally foreign, or apparently so, to the traditions of all nationalities.
It is no secret that the fruits of language study are in no sort of relation to the labour spent on teaching and learning them.
It would, of course, be hopeless to attempt to crowd into an international language all those local overtones of meaning which are so dear to the heart of the nationalist.
No important national language, at least in the Occidental world, has complete regularity of grammatical structure, nor is there a single logical category which is adequately and consistently handled in terms of linguistic symbolism.
It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection.
Language is like money, without which specific relative values may well exist and be felt, but cannot be reduced to a common denominator.
The sea speaks a language polite people never repeat. It is a colossal scavenger slang and has no respect.
Slang is a language that rolls up its sleeves, spits on its hands and goes to work.
Go learn the language. Go take some acting lessons. Start from zero like everybody else.
Journalism students need to understand it and need a solid background in the liberal arts, in sociology, economics, literature and language, because they won't get it later on.
The transition state of manners and language cannot be too often insisted upon: for this affected the process at both ends, giving the artist in fictitious life an uncertain model to copy and unstable materials to work in.
We breathed the air of freedom without knowing the language or any person.