When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.
Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.
Freedom is hammered out on the anvil of discussion, dissent, and debate.
A dissenting minority feels free only when it can impose its will on the majority: what it abominates most is the dissent of the majority.
So now is the time, more than ever, for those who truly value all the principles of democracy, especially including dissent, to be the most forceful in speaking up, standing up and speaking out.
In the end it is worse to suppress dissent than to run the risk of heresy.
In a democracy dissent is an act of faith. Like medicine, the test of its value is not in its taste, but in its effects.
In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith.
Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.
May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.
No matter that patriotism is too often the refuge of scoundrels. Dissent, rebellion, and all-around hell-raising remain the true duty of patriots.
The rightful claim to dissent is an existential right of the individual.
Dissent is the native activity of the scientist, and it has got him into a good deal of trouble in the last years. But if that is cut off, what is left will not be a scientist. And I doubt whether it will be a man.
Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime.