I can work in films as long as the story doesn't have a realistic nature. If I'm working with an allegory, a fantasy, it can be developed in synthetic terms.
I didn't choose literature. Literature chose me. There was no decision on my side.
I do believe that reading can help you understand what you're writing and see what others are doing. But sometimes the desire for more information can act as an inhibitor.
I don't have traceable literary models because I haven't had great literary influences in my life.
I am very interested in what has been called bad taste. I believe the fear of displaying a soi-disant bad taste stops us from venturing into special cultural zones.
We should try to understand our innermost needs. We shouldn't use irony to reduce their power.
What better model of a synthesis than a nocturnal dream? Dreams simplify, don't they?
What's better, a poetic intuition or an intellectual work? I think they complement each other.
Whenever I write, I'm always thinking of the reader.
Writers are not meant for action.
All of my problems are rather complicated - I need an entire novel to deal with them, not a short story or a movie. It's like a personal therapy.
The writer needs to react to his or her own internal universe, to his or her own point of view. If he or she doesn't have a personal point of view, it's impossible to be a creator.