It is right and natural that generous minds while in the twenties should think the books which try to reform the world's wrong the greatest of all.
My brother used to say that I wrote faster than he could read. He wrote two books - of poems - better than all mine put together.
My best chance is that, in a happy moment, I hit upon St Francis as the subject for a series of plays. Others might have written them better: but, as I have written them, the advantage will probably remain mine.
Life is the most versatile thing under the sun; and in the pursuit of life and character the author who works in a groove works in blinkers.
It is the sincerest thing I have written, caught by the drama of a soul struggling in the contrary toils of love and religion - death brought them into harmony.
I still think that if the human race, or even one nation, could only get right about its God the rest would follow.
If I loved all the world as I do you, I shouldn't write books to it: I should only write letters to it, and that would be only a clumsy stage on the way to entire telepathy.
If I live for another ten years I shall probably have written all that I want to write.
I was just then going through a healthy reaction from the orthodoxy of my youth; religion had become for me not so much a possession as an obsession, which I was trying to throw off, and this iconoclastic tale of an imaginary tribe was the result.
It was then, I think, that I discovered that the best way of bringing a medieval subject home to my generation was not to be medieval in its treatment.