These days there are not enough of such intermediary groups, between the state and the individual, with the result that political leaders are often unduly guided by opinion polls.
For me, socialism has always been about liberty and solidarity, but also about responsibility.
The problem of how we finance the welfare state should not obscure a separate issue: if each person thinks he has an inalienable right to welfare, no matter what happens to the world, that's not equity, it's just creating a society where you can't ask anything of people.
The European model is, first, a social and economic system founded on the role of the market, for no computer in the world can process information better than the market.
The European model is in danger if we obliterate the principle of personal responsibility.
The driving force behind the liberal counter-offensive in Europe has been a reaction against irresponsibility.
The countries that share this conception should be able to go further together, without excluding the others, since they can still live in a greater community of exchange and co-operation.
My problem is how to find the best way of being useful.
I had to think whether, after 50 years of hard slog, I was still lucid and fresh enough for the job.
I cannot resign myself to the decline of Europe, and of France.
The unions still have a job to do, representing their members' interests to governments and parliaments. And I think collective agreements still have a role, alongside markets and laws.
My presidential victory, if it had happened, would have been artificial in relation to the Socialist party. It may be that on my deathbed, I will come to regret my decision, but for the moment, I live at peace with it.
The unions may continue to decline, but if they do, it'll be their fault.
Even in Britain, the trade unions tell me that employment contracts have less protection than in the past.
Cinema explains American society. It's like a Western, with good guys and bad guys, where the weak don't have a place.