It is only when I lose contact with the painting that the result is a mess. Otherwise there is pure harmony, an easy give and take, and the painting comes out well.

It doesn't make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement.

I'm very representational some of the time, and a little all of the time. But when you're painting out of your unconscious, figures are bound to emerge.

I have no fear of making changes, destroying the image, etc., because the painting has a life of its own.

I hardly ever stretch the canvas before painting.

I don't work from drawings. I don't make sketches and drawings and color sketches into a final painting.

I continue to get further away from the usual painter's tools such as easel, palette, brushes, etc.

He drove his kind of realism at me so hard I bounced right into nonobjective painting.

Abstract painting is abstract. It confronts you. There was a reviewer a while back who wrote that my pictures didn't have any beginning or any end. He didn't mean it as a compliment, but it was.

Bums are the well-to-do of this day. They didn't have as far to fall.

New needs need new techniques. And the modern artists have found new ways and new means of making their statements... the modern painter cannot express this age, the airplane, the atom bomb, the radio, in the old forms of the Renaissance or of any other past culture.

Today painters do not have to go to a subject matter outside of themselves. Most modern painters work from a different source. They work from within.

When I'm painting, I'm not aware of what I'm doing. It's only after a get acquainted period that I see what I've been about. I've no fears about making changes for the painting has a life of its own.

My painting does not come from the easel.

When I am in my painting, I'm not aware of what I'm doing.