Writers of fiction, when they begin, are more likely to try the short form.
All writers are the same - they forget a thousand good reviews and remember one bad one.
At the height of the McCarthy period, writers were being hounded.
Curiously, the United States is full of writers who have one big work in their life and that's all.
I haven't stuck to any formula. Most great writers stick to the same style, but I wanted to be more various.
I would say the next imminent hot writers are often the writers from the decade before you were born.
With network shows, writers can be so protective of every syllable.
The thing with being on a series that runs that long is that the writers run out of things to do.
I get so used to working with writers that my prime occupation is development.
Writers would submit scripts to me, and if I liked one well enough to submit to magazine editors, I had the know-how whether the story was good or bad.
And, of course, some SF is set close enough to here and now that Anglo and European do apply. Since many of the writers come from those backgrounds, so does much of the fiction.
There may be something to the suggestion about the pace of technological change intimidating writers, though - it's been awfully hard to keep ahead of real developments.
Of course, the way writers think about those things is almost certain to be affected by their own cultural background, and it would be hard to deny that, for whatever reasons, a lot of SF writers come from Anglo or European backgrounds.
Now that I'm taking some time off from school, I've been reading a lot to make sure I don't forget everything. It's mostly classics and nonfiction accounts from actors, directors and writers from the '40s and '50s.
Literature is always trying to show other parts of this immense universe in which we live. It's endless. I'm sure there will be other writers who will discover new worlds.