Some ideas you have to chew on, then roll them around a lot, play with them before you can turn them into funky science fiction.
Science fiction writers put characters into a world with arbitrary rules and work out what happens.
One of the nice things about science fiction is that it lets us carry out thought experiments.
Now, being a science fiction writer, when I see a natural principle, I wonder if it could fail.
Traditional science is all about finding shortcuts.
Science progresses best when observations force us to alter our preconceptions.
I did not imagine that the second half of my life would be spent on efforts to avert a mortal danger to humanity created by science.
Indeed, the whole human species is endangered, by nuclear weapons or by other means of wholesale destruction which further advances in science are likely to produce.
I saw science as being in harmony with humanity.
From my earliest days I had a passion for science.
But the first the general public learned about the discovery was the news of the destruction of Hiroshima by the atom bomb. A splendid achievement of science and technology had turned malign. Science became identified with death and destruction.
At a time when science plays such a powerful role in the life of society, when the destiny of the whole of mankind may hinge on the results of scientific research, it is incumbent on all scientists to be fully conscious of that role, and conduct themselves accordingly.
When a scientist is ahead of his times, it is often through misunderstanding of current, rather than intuition of future truth. In science there is never any error so gross that it won't one day, from some perspective, appear prophetic.
A body of work such as Pasteur's is inconceivable in our time: no man would be given a chance to create a whole science. Nowadays a path is scarcely opened up when the crowd begins to pour in.
Science has made us gods even before we are worthy of being men.