Our private property must be sacrificed.
Government has no other end, but the preservation of property.
The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property.
Where there is no property there is no injustice.
Every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself.
Private property was the original source of freedom. It still is its main ballpark.
Unionization, as opposed to communism, presupposes the relation of employment; it is based upon the wage system and it recognizes fully and unreservedly the institution of private property and the right to investment profit.
A culture without property, or in which creators can't get paid, is anarchy, not freedom.
Americans have been selling this view around the world: that progress comes from perfect protection of intellectual property.
A free culture is not a culture without property; it is not a culture in which artists don't get paid.
So uncritically do we accept the idea of property in culture that we don't even question when the control of that property removes our ability, as a people, to develop our culture democratically.
Notwithstanding the fact that the most innovative and progressive space we've seen - the Internet - has been the place where intellectual property has been least respected. You know, facts don't get in the way of this ideology.
Each man has an equal social right to multiply his power of motion by all the social factors of civilization. Private property in any of these factors is inconsistent with this fundamental right; it must, obviously, prove a source of economic despotism and industrial slavery.
Intellectual property is an important legal and cultural issue. Society as a whole has complex issues to face here: private ownership vs. open source, and so on.
The real protection of life and property, always and everywhere.