Death? Why this fuss about death? Use your imagination, try to visualize a world without death! Death is the essential condition of life, not an evil.
Work and struggle and never accept an evil that you can change.
I think that technologies are morally neutral until we apply them. It's only when we use them for good or for evil that they become good or evil.
Knavery seems to be so much a the striking feature of its inhabitants that it may not in the end be an evil that they will become aliens to this kingdom.
On the choice of friends, Our good or evil name depends.
Life has no meaning unless one lives it with a will, at least to the limit of one's will. Virtue, good, evil are nothing but words, unless one takes them apart in order to build something with them; they do not win their true meaning until one knows how to apply them.
How easy it is to judge rightly after one sees what evil comes from judging wrongly!
Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil.
Capital as such is not evil; it is its wrong use that is evil. Capital in some form or other will always be needed.
Non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good.
Man's nature is not essentially evil. Brute nature has been know to yield to the influence of love. You must never despair of human nature.
I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.
I have also seen children successfully surmounting the effects of an evil inheritance. That is due to purity being an inherent attribute of the soul.
I do all the evil I can before I learn to shun it? Is it not enough to know the evil to shun it? If not, we should be sincere enough to admit that we love evil too well to give it up.
Is it not enough to know the evil to shun it? If not, we should be sincere enough to admit that we love evil too well to give it up.