I think to be oversensitive about cliches is like being oversensitive about table manners.
Cliches are what make you understand something.
You need cliches. Cliches are what people respond to.
The cliches are that it's the most generic Starsky and Hutch plot you can find.
My interests were aroused, and my faith in the cliches of the subject destroyed, as so often with other subjects, by the discussions with my friend, Aaron Director.
I'm working class, and want people to know I'm not unintelligent and all the other cliches that come with it.
Cliches and adjectives permeated my prose.
I think my mistakes were kind of common - leaning on cliches and adjectives in the place of clear, vivid writing. But at least I knew how to spell, which seems to be a rarity these days.
I never appreciated 'positive heroes' in literature. They are almost always cliches, copies of copies, until the model is exhausted. I prefer perplexity, doubt, uncertainty, not just because it provides a more 'productive' literary raw material, but because that is the way we humans really are.
Last, but not least, avoid cliches like the plague.
The computing field is always in need of new cliches.
Cliches about supporting the troops are designed to distract from failed policies, policies promoted by powerful special interests that benefit from war, anything to steer the discussion away from the real reasons the war in Iraq will not end anytime soon.
I'm one of the cliches that has grown up.
Buzzwords and cliches - those are stock in trade. There's nothing wrong with them.
The ground swell is what's going to sink you as well as being what buoys you up. These are cliches also, of course, and I'm sometimes interested in how much one can get away with.