Men don't oppress women any more than women oppress men.
When women hold off from marrying men, we call it independence. When men hold off from marrying women, we call it fear of commitment.
All women's issues are to some degree men's issues and all men's issues are to some degree women's issues because when either sex wins unilaterally both sexes lose.
Feminists have confused opportunity with outcome.
And then in 1956 or 1957 my family went over to Europe and I moved over with them, and immediately people in Europe thought my perspective on that issue was 100% correct.
And we reduce almost all male-female problems by working on both the female and the male. And that usually means having both sexes take responsibility.
For example, the equivalent of a woman being treated as a sex object is a man being treated as a success object.
I don't think there's anything that is a greater area of discrimination against women today than the fact that nowhere in the world is there a female role model in team sports that more than half of a general audience would recognize.
I started to get very well recognized in the early seventies as the only man in the United States who had been elected three times to the board of NOW in New York City.
In America and in most of the industrialized world, men are coming to be thought of by feminists in very much the same way that Jews were thought of by early Nazis. The comparison is overwhelmingly scary.
In fact, the socialization gives us the tools to fill our evolutionary roles. They are our building blocks.
It evolved from my experience in the fifties, growing up during the McCarthy era, and hearing a lot of assumptions that America was wonderful and Communism was terrible.
Men are often a lot less vindictive than women are, because we are rejected constantly every day.
Men's competitive team sports focus on the balance between individual achievement and team achievement with the emphasis on team achievement.
Nobody really believes in equality anyway.