The narrative of serial art works more like music than like literature.
The artist is seen like a producer of commodities, like a factory that turns our refrigerators.
Minimal art went nowhere.
Just as the development of earth art and installation art stemmed from the idea of taking art out of the galleries, the basis of my involvement with public art is a continuation of wall drawings.
I was not interested in irony; I wanted to emphasize the primacy of the idea in making art.
I didn't want to save art - I respected the older artists too much to think art needed saving. But I knew it was finished, even though, at that time, I didn't know what I would do.
I believe that the artist's involvement in the capitalist structure is disadvantageous to the artist and forces him to produce objects in order to live.
Buying books was a way anyone could acquire a work of art for very little.
I became interested in making books, starting about 1965, when I did the Serial Project #1, deciding that I needed a small book to show how the work could be understood and how the system worked.
Conceptual art became the liberating idea that gave the art of the next 40 years its real impetus.
When artists make art, they shouldn't question whether it is permissible to do one thing or another.
Unless you're involved with thinking about what you're doing, you end up doing the same thing over and over, and that becomes tedious and, in the end, defeating.
The thinking of John Cage derived from Duchamp and Dada. I was not interested in that.
The system is the work of art; the visual work of art is the proof of the System. The visual aspect can't be understood without understanding the system. It isn't what it looks like but what it is that is of basic importance.
The other great development has been in photography, but that too was influenced by Conceptual art.