For scholarship - if it is to be scholarship - requires, in addition to liberty, that the truth take precedence over all sectarian interests, including self-interest.
Individual scientists like myself - and many more conspicuous - pointed to the dangers of radioactive fallout over Canada if we were to launch nuclear weapons to intercept incoming bombers.
Science gives us a powerful vocabulary, and it is impossible to produce a vocabulary with which one can only say nice things.
Science exists, moreover, only as a journey toward troth. Stifle dissent and you end that journey.
Our assessment of socio-economic worth is largely a sham. We scientists should not lend ourselves to it - though we routinely do. We should, instead, insist on applying the criterion of quality.
Others think it the responsibility of scientists to coerce the rest of society, because they have the power that derives from special knowledge.
It is this, at its most basic, that makes science a humane pursuit; it acknowledges the commonality of people's experience.
Instead, in the absence of respect for human rights, science and its offspring technology have been used in this century as brutal instruments for oppression.
In the late 1950s a major topic under discussion was whether Canada should acquire nuclear weapons.
In nation after nation, democracy has taken the place of autocracy.
If we treasure our own experience and regard it as real, we must also treasure other people's experience.
Science never gives up searching for truth, since it never claims to have achieved it.
For science must breathe the oxygen of freedom.
Some dreamers demand that scientists only discover things that can be used for good.
Better to die in the pursuit of civilized values, we believed, than in a flight underground. We were offering a value system couched in the language of science.