If people want bells and whistles and all of that, there are bells and whistles available. If they don't want bells and whistles there are places to go where they are not available.
I'm not in the judgment part of journalism.
As I say, I'm a discourse advocate. What form it comes is less important to me than the fact that there is discourse.
I'm in the civil discourse business. I think it takes all kinds. And more power to everybody.
I'm in the reporting part of journalism.
I have great faith in the intelligence of the American viewer and reader to put two and two together and come up with four.
Best I can do for them is to give them every piece of information I can find and let them make the judgments. That's just my basic view of my function as a journalist.
If we don't have an informed electorate we don't have a democracy. So I don't care how people get the information, as long as they get it. I'm just doing it my particular way and I feel lucky I can do it the way I want to do it.
Everyone should get their news however they want to and in whatever form they want. I'm not going to sit back in judgment of other people and the way they do it.
You want to see an angry person? Let me hear a cell phone go off.
Most of the stories I have covered in 45 years have been gray stories.
I'm an expert on the NewsHour and it isn't how I practice journalism. I am not involved in the story. I serve only as a reporter or someone asking questions. I am not the story.
We have increasingly fewer and fewer journalists who have any military experience and understand what life is like in the military and in combat.
There's always a germ of truth in just about everything.
People can say anything they want to. If they don't want to get the news from me, get it from somebody else. It's not something I'm going to worry about, I'm sorry.