Discussion is just a tool. You have to aim; the final goal must be a decision.
In every European nation, there have been problems in history when the society was too divided.
You cannot make easy decisions unless you first commit yourself to hard solutions.
Finland had a civil war less than 100 years ago, just like in Ireland. If you look at the history of newly independent nations, civil war is almost every time present, even in the United States.
I do not want to speak about overpopulation or birth control, but I think education is the way to give new impetus to the poverty question.
I really do hope that the Millennium Summit gives new impetus to the work of the United Nations.
I recently reread an article of mine written in 1964, and I think it is still valid. There is not much difference. Many of the items on the agenda 37 years ago are still there.
I think I can regard myself as a political decision-maker.
I think we have grave problems. I am very much concerned about environmental questions, even though in Finnish society, we are not facing the most urgent problems.
If there is something I would like to do as President of the General Assembly, it is to place more emphasis on the issue of education, which enables a better life for women.
If you come to a negotiation table saying you have the final truth, that you know nothing but the truth and that is final, you will get nothing.
In Finland we have equal political rights for women and men. We do not regard ourselves according to sex.
In Finland, we learned quite a lot from our own civil war. The wounds were visible when I was a boy, but my generation went into the Second World War and it united the Finnish nation, so I do not see any more wounds.
In international or national crises, there are always questions of lack of confidence. You have to change the minds of the people in order to get results.
Men and women have roles - their roles are different, but their rights are equal.