There is a series of sectors which could be severely disrupted by terrorist attacks, particularly if they were to happen in several member states simultaneously.
Ultimately, freedom and democracy are stronger than fear and tyranny.
We are familiar with terrorism. But indiscriminate, cross-border, religiously motivated terrorism is new.
In situations of military conflict, civil strife, lawlessness, bad governance, and human rights violations, terrorists find it easier to hide, train and prepare their attacks.
We have an integrated picture of the threat from outside and from within that is provided not only to our foreign ministers but also to our justice and interior ministers.
In the fight against terrorism, national agencies keep full control over their police forces, security and intelligence agencies and judicial authorities.
We remain vulnerable. There is no such thing as 100 percent security against terrorism.
We still lack a global definition of terrorism.
Europe has a long and tragic history of mostly domestic terrorism.
I remain optimistic. What we've seen in Europe and the rest of the world is that freedom has a much stronger attraction than radical fundamentalism.
If information ends up in the wrong hands, the lives of people very often are immediately at risk.
You can't get closer to the heart of national sovereignty than national security and intelligence services.
If you combat an international phenomenon, it is indispensable to share information internationally.
Look at Iraq; look at Afghanistan, where at great personal physical risk people have gone to the polls and have rejected the appeal from Bin Laden and his allies to stay at home.
In intelligence work, there are limits to the amount of information one can share. Confidentiality is essential.