Any suggestion that I'm writing about political operatives because I'm interested in political operatives misses the entire point.
Because of Watergate in part, I am kind of a magnet for calls and information and suggestions.
Clinton feels a profound alienation from the Washington culture here, and I happen to agree with him.
Deep Throat did serve the public interest by providing the guidance and information to us.
I give lectures for money, but all the money goes to charity. So, I make no money from it.
Deep Throat's information, and in my view, courage, allowed the newspaper to use what he knew and suspected.
I gave my word that this source would not be identified unless he changed his mind. He has not.
I believe there's too little patience and context to many of the investigations I read or see on television.
I believe Watergate shows that the system did work. Particularly the Judiciary and the Congress, and ultimately an independent prosecutor working in the Executive Branch.
I deal with first-hand sources. And give the people, even John Sununu, the opportunity to respond to what I've been told by first-hand sources.
I don't think there will ever be a permanent truce, but I believe the media needs to be more careful and be willing to count to 10 before rushing on the air or into print.
Clinton... believes that the Washington Press Corps is so out of touch that it is absolutely inconceivable that reporters would understand the issues that people are really dealing with in their lives.
Deep Throat was a very unfortunate name given to the source by the managing editor of The Washington Post.
Watergate provides a model case study of the interaction and powers of each of the branches of government. It also is a morality play with a sad and dramatic ending.
The legislator learns that when you talk a lot, you get in trouble. You have to listen a lot to make deals.