When our interests matched, the Americans have been good to us, and when the interests differed, they wanted us to mold ourselves to them, which we refused.
Since its very inception, Israel has been a threat.
When Lebanon started its resistance it was a small and divided country.
We, in Syria, our point of view stems from our experience.
We believe that Lebanon has been the first real experience for all the Arabs.
We are dealing with treachery and threats, which accompanied the establishment of Israel.
Today, the Iraqi citizen sees that America is coming and wants to occupy his country and kill him, and he is willing to experience for himself what happened in Palestine.
The U.S. and Britain are incapable of controlling all of Iraq.
It would be a mistake to link anything that Israel does to a certain circumstance. And it is a mistake to feel comfortable in any circumstance just because Israel did not act on it.
The most significant indicator that there is no disaster in Iraq is the fact that there is no exodus.
Lebanon was under Israeli occupation, up to its capital, but we did not consider that a disaster. Why? Because it was very clear that there are ways to resist.
When we analyze this war in a materialistic way and ask when is it going to end and who will be the winner and the loser, it means that we do not see the endgame.
Worry does not mean fear, but readiness for the confrontation.
You in Lebanon, your power is no match to Israel. Israel, militarily, is more powerful than you and maybe it is more powerful than all the Arab countries, or most of them.
The Israeli lobby has clout in the U.S., which means that re-arranging the region and controlling its resources one way or another, will serve Israel through its control over the American administration.