One of the things I learned in law school is that there's nothing wrong or undesirable or dishonorable or destructive about amending the Constitution.
Necessity has no law.
The law is simply expediency wearing a long white dress.
Through the centuries, men of law have been persistently concerned with the resolution of disputes in ways that enable society to achieve its goals with a minimum of force and maximum of reason.
One of my contemporaries, a colorless chap who worked much harder at his law studies, is now Prime Minister.
Success comprises in itself the seeds of its own decline and sport is not spared by this law.
Since September 11, 2001, many in this nation and this Congress have a deeper appreciation for the importance of the sacrifices made by our law enforcement officers.
It is a besetting vice of democracies to substitute public opinion for law. This is the usual form in which masses of men exhibit their tyranny.
It is the besetting vice of democracies to substitute public opinion for law. This is the usual form in which the masses of men exhibit their tyranny.
No civilized society can long exist, with an active power in its bosom that is stronger than the law.
The very existence of government at all, infers inequality. The citizen who is preferred to office becomes the superior to those who are not, so long as he is the repository of power, and the child inherits the wealth of the parent as a controlling law of society.
I sometimes wish that people would put a little more emphasis upon the observance of the law than they do upon its enforcement.
One with the law is a majority.
We want our government to protect us, to make sure something like 9/11 never happens again. We quickly moved to give law enforcement more power to do this. But that now begs the question, did we move to fast? Did we give too much power away? I don't have the answer.
The first law of ecology is that everything is related to everything else.