A great many people seem to think writing poetry is worthwhile, even though it pays next to nothing and is not as widely read as it should be.
A life is not sufficiently elevated for poetry, unless, of course, the life has been made into an art.
But I tend to think of the expressive part of me as rather tedious - never curious or responsive, but blind and self-serving.
And yet, in a culture like ours, which is given to material comforts, and addicted to forms of entertainment that offer immediate gratification, it is surprising that so much poetry is written.
And Robert Lowell, of course - in his poems, we're not located in his actual life. We're located more in the externals, in the journalistic facts of his life.
And at least in poetry you should feel free to lie. That is, not to lie, but to imagine what you want, to follow the direction of the poem.
It's very hard to write humor.
I believe that all poetry is formal in that it exists within limits, limits that are either inherited by tradition or limits that language itself imposes.
I am not concerned with truth, nor with conventional notions of what is beautiful.
I certainly can't speak for all cultures or all societies, but it's clear that in America, poetry serves a very marginal purpose. It's not part of the cultural mainstream.
I tend to like poems that engage me - that is to say, which do not bore me.
I think the best American poetry is the poetry that utilizes the resources of poetry rather than exploits the defects or triumphs of the poet's personality.
I would say that American poetry has always been a poetry of personal testimony.
Pain is filtered in a poem so that it becomes finally, in the end, pleasure.
Poetry is something that happens in universities, in creative writing programs or in English departments.