I think most people don't react well to being screamed at. It's counterproductive.
I try to just communicate what I want done as clearly and simply as possible.
I was raised not to be rude, but I also try to get the best work out of people.
People do have viewing patterns, and you disrupt those at your own peril. That's something that everybody learned after 1988. The numbers have gone down every year since that strike. Big time.
And the consumer doesn't care. They don't watch networks, they watch TV shows.
It was like in Samoa when they'd put up a movie screen on the beach and show movies and the locals would run behind the sheet to see where the people went. It was pretty grim.
It's show business. No show, no business.
The heart and soul of network programming is series programming, the weekly repetition of characters you like having in your house.
The environment doesn't change that radically. You are still going to go home at night and NBC is going to be there, ABC and CBS will still be there.
The agendas on the management side of the table now are not in sync like they used to be because you have vastly different entities supplying programming to networks.
The ad revenues still go up because nothing dependably delivers the eyeballs that successful series do.
People recognize certain things, like 'D' means 'this dialogue stinks.' We're dealing with shows that are written here, shot in New York and posted back here. Accurate communication is a necessity.
I would say that if you really wished to be a working member of the community, don't go out on strike because then there's no work and no potential of work.
Drama or comedy programming is still the surest way for advertisers to reach a mass audience. Once that changes, all bets are off.
Advertising is the art of the tiny. You have to tell a complete a story and deliver a complete message in a very encapsulated form. It disciplines you to cut away extraneous information.